How It Really Works One Colorado Family and Their Divorce Mediation
Skeptical re Divorce Mediation? Curious About How
Family Mediation Really Works?
It's natural to entertain a healthy skepticism regarding any
newer and non-traditional divorce process. For many couples, divorce is a time
of fear and loss of control over much in their lives. As consumers, we
understandably are reluctant to try newer approaches in matters of extreme
importance to us and to our families, especially when we're told we can save
money and preserve greater control over our destiny. For some, it all sometimes
sounds too good to be true.
As a result, when it comes to divorce and family mediation, potential clients
often approach us with concerns of whether this emerging alternative to
contested divorce litigation really works. And, if it does work, what does the
process really look like?
Although every family is unique (one of mediation's great strengths is its
ability to customize mediated agreements), we profile in this article one real
Colorado family's divorce circumstances and their story of how divorce mediation
worked for them and their family.
Meet our Colorado mediation clients, Jim and Mary.
The Case of Jim and Mary: One Colorado Family
Jim had heard of the alternative process of divorce mediation and urged his estranged wife Mary to consider mediating their Colorado divorce
at the outset. Initially, Mary felt it necessary to hire a divorce attorney and Jim followed her lead. But after many thousands of dollars of attorney's fees
and an impasse in their case, Mary reconsidered and the couple decided to try mediation.
With their divorce lawyers' support,
Jim and Mary chose to work with Larry, a Colorado attorney-mediator and director
of our family mediation company, Divorce Resolutions®, Colorado Center for
Divorce MediationTM. Jim and Mary saw as their goals: 1) expediting closure of
their divorce, and 2) promoting their co-parenting relationship as they moved to
Their Family Circumstances & Divorce Challenges
Jim and Mary had been married more than a decade and had three young children. They held different views about parenting time issues and faced significant income constraints.
Mary wished to continue to work part-time (in her at-home consulting business) for the foreseeable future to minimize the impact of her and Jim's separation on their children.
Jim had been laid off from his work recently and although he had meaningful temporary employment, he also faced uncertain future job prospects and big economic challenges.
Jim viewed this choice of Mary's (to work part-time) as a luxury they could not afford, and a choice that would unfairly impact on his obligation of child support and even his basic ability to meet his own needs. (Jim worried about his affording housing suitable for his parenting time with the children.)
Similarly, to allow Mary and the children the continuity of continued residence in the former family home would ordinarily mean Mary's securing prohibitively expensive refinancing, in order to "buy out" Jim's interest. At the same time, selling the home would cost both of them significant monies in realtor's fees and related charges, and necessitate substantial additional housing startup expenses.
Shared Parenting Values
In mediation, Jim and Mary achieved some momentum by an early focus on what they both wished for their children in the future. In a detailed inventory of their values as parents, they became clearer that they had a low potential for conflict regarding major upbringing decisions, and good reasons to conserve their emotional and financial resources by avoiding litigation.
Finding An Equitable Financial Plan
With Larry's assistance as their neutral mediator, Mary and Jim focused on their "underlying interests" and abandoned their
initial rigid "positions.". As a result, Mary and Jim arrived at some remarkable trade-offs in designing their after-divorce financial plan.
They agreed on the amount fairly owed Jim for his share of the marital equity. Mary, however, would not be required by Jim to sell the home or refinance its mortgages at that time.
As a result, Mary and their children would not relocate, but instead, have the stability of remaining in their home and community of many years.
At a time when Jim's future income was uncertain and likely to be compromised, he would instead receive a legitimate reduction of the obligation he otherwise would owe Mary for child support. (Mary signed a promissory note to repay Jim monies owed him, by virtue of her receiving the home in the divorce. Jim's child support, premised on his reasonable potential income, would be reduced by an offset of monies Mary owed him and that he might have received had he forced the house's sale.)
Jim and Mary, and Their Children: A Win-Win Through Family Mediation!
It was a win-win. Mediation required some detailed budget work and the use of some specialized planning tools for
Mary and Jim to understand each other's available after-tax income, upon divorce. (Indeed, they legitimately characterized a portion of
Jim's support payment to Mary as spousal "maintenance," and created more after-tax income to share.
Moreover, these savings effectively paid for the entire costs of their
Together, however, Jim and Mary affordably and efficiently reached a
divorce financial plan that was manageable for, and seemed fair to, each of them. They accomplished in this regard, the first of
their two goals: simply moving through their divorce, a process that had
Moreover, the entire cost of their doing that work in mediation including Larry's authoring their agreement was a third of what they had already spent with lawyers (and remember, they had
not been to court for their final divorce hearing)!
Additionally, both Mary and Jim now have the knowledge that they can safely and efficiently reexamine future parenting and child support issues in
family mediation, as and if they arise, in their continued shared parenting. They have taken positive steps forward toward the
second of their two goals: forging a strong relationship as co-parents of their children.
Success in Family Mediation Unusual?
Jim and Mary's success in creative problem-solving, and their high satisfaction with
their family's mediation, are not unusual.
Although no single approach is appropriate for all divorce or parenting
disputes, experienced family mediators rarely fail to assist couples to reach
their own solutions to their family's real needs. The risk of family
mediation remains low: its confidentiality is almost always protected
as is the case with Colorado mediation laws, and advance monies are limited, if
required at all. And, the personal emotional, financial, and co-parenting
benefits of mediation can be enormous, as was the case with Jim and Mary.
About the Author
Denver, Colorado family lawyer-mediator Lawrence F. King, J.D.
is a full-time divorce mediator with Divorce Resolutions®, Colorado Center for Divorce MediationTM. For more information, visit the Center's award-winning
Colorado divorce resources
website, with its with free
Colorado divorce tools and forms, "Best of the Net"
child custody and parenting plans resources, frequently asked
divorce mediation questions, and
Colorado divorce laws news and information.
Larry can be contacted by phone at (303) 650-1750, or by
| || |
Follow Us On
THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
Do not take any actions based upon the information contained within this web site without first consulting an attorney or an appropriate professional depending upon the content of the information.